Monday, June 13, 2011

judith rakers

images Judith Rakers bereitet sich judith rakers. Judith Rakers and Stefan
  • Judith Rakers and Stefan



  • StuckInTheMuck
    05-03 08:17 AM
    Updating profile should fill up your information in the tracker.

    Will make a not of it.

    Thanks a lot.

    GO IV GO

    Recently I had some trouble updating my profile. The "Additional Information" section has a series of RFE-related (on I-485, I-140, EAD and AP) boxes, where one must enter a valid date in the specified format. Because I did not receive any RFE yet, I tried to get past this page by entering 00/00/0000 ("N/A" did not work), which did not work either, and finally I settled with my PD on all these RFE boxes (which is, of course, incorrect). So, maybe the powers-that-be can fix the problem, and, also remove these wrong entries from my profile?
    Thanks.





    wallpaper Judith Rakers and Stefan judith rakers. Judith Rakers besucht
  • Judith Rakers besucht



  • billu
    08-20 02:10 PM
    4. An apology from USCIS for the delay!!

    i think we should have USCIS director come home personally to deliver sincere apology in both verbal and written for making people from india file GC and provide detailed explaination for reasons of the delay....thats the only way for him to keep getting our business in future...





    judith rakers. Raab und Judith Rakers.
  • Raab und Judith Rakers.



  • gcwanted101
    09-01 04:26 PM
    Thanks gcwanted101.
    So it looks like G639 is only for requests to USCIS and not for DOL.

    Can anyone who has submitted an FOIA request to DOL for Labor docs clarify the process?
    I browsed the DOL web site, but they don't seem to have a form similar to USCIS G-639 form.
    lj_rr,

    you dont need any special form to make FOIA request to DOL.

    "The Department of Labor does not require a special form in order to make a FOIA request. Requests must be in writing, either handwritten or typed. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, mail, or to foiarequest@dol.gov. Although, as discussed immediately below, certain information may be required from a requester. "

    U.S. Department of Labor -- Freedom of Information Act Guide (http://www.dol.gov/dol/foia/guide6.htm#how)





    2011 Judith Rakers besucht judith rakers. Judith Rakers auf dem einem
  • Judith Rakers auf dem einem



  • zCool
    12-21 09:49 AM
    There are some companies that enter into agreements with ppl like that. Of course it is not legal and of course it's exploitative and predatory.. but depends what was decided.. If his employer offered with 100K on paper but talked abt this type of arrangement verbally (assuming he got sub labor at the same time ) it might make sense.. in any other case.. he's getting ripped off and better that he sues the employer.. merely credible threat of lawsuit should make the company pay..



    more...


    judith rakers. Judith Rakers will guide
  • Judith Rakers will guide



  • forgerator
    11-11 11:49 AM
    Thank you for the post. It is really helpful. May I know if the new job should be >=50% different from the current job (EB3) offer? Or it doesn�t matter because of the MS requirement?

    Thank you
    Project_A

    It should be greater than 50% different if you wish to use the previous position's experience.

    Here is how it happened in my case

    Company 1 - 2yrs exp

    Company 2 position 1 - 3 yrs exp

    Company 2 position 2 - 0.5 yrs exp (I was able to only reclaim the 2yrs exp gained at company 1 but that along with my existing MS degree was enough for filing for EB2. In company 2 both position 1 and position 2 are similar so I could not use those 3 yrs for my EB2).





    judith rakers. Judith Rakers
  • Judith Rakers



  • sixburgh
    08-13 06:05 PM
    I saw some information somewhere, but don't have the link right away to post here.
    But here is the crux of it.

    Basically the guy said that : assuming that the wife is working on EAD, and the moment she gets an H4 extension approval, she automatically comes on H4 status, but the very next day if she goes back to work on EAD, the H4 status gets invalidated and person comes on AOS status instantly.

    Now should she force the company to update the I-9 on that date, is the question.

    The bottom line I think is : there is nothing called as a STATUS field in any USCIS or DOS computer system. Its what you do that determines your status. I believe USCIS allows dual intent.

    Does anyone think that I am wrong?



    more...


    judith rakers. Judith Rakers moderiert
  • Judith Rakers moderiert



  • REEF�
    06-06 12:08 PM
    So why do you have red is good? Was it creativity :P.





    2010 Raab und Judith Rakers. judith rakers. Judith Rakers bereitet sich
  • Judith Rakers bereitet sich



  • Life2Live
    01-10 04:05 PM
    I got I-140 RFE (EB2) regarding my education to prove the Bachelor degree I have is equivalent to US Bachelor degree. I have 3 years bachelor degree they are saying US Bachelor degree is 4 years.

    My Lawyer is still working on it. I dont have say more than this that my freaking company is slow, unprofessional, irresponsible and typical exploiting consulting company.

    My company qualifies for one of the company to be blacklisted. (There are lot of other incidents not only this I-140 RFE delay) :-)



    more...


    judith rakers. Judith Rakers; Andreas Pfaff
  • Judith Rakers; Andreas Pfaff



  • gc2
    09-23 11:11 AM
    i am waiting for response from my lawyer in atlanta. i was wondering if people have gone through similar situation where they take a promotion with same employer or change jobs. Since AC21 leaves a lot of room for interpretation, it would be helpful to know past cases.

    thanks





    hair Judith Rakers auf dem einem judith rakers. Judith Rakers (Tagesschau
  • Judith Rakers (Tagesschau



  • ss2005
    07-24 10:17 AM
    Hi hydubadi,

    I am aslo in same situation ... FNU and Pending 485.

    My attorney says... just write a letter after chaning the name in passport. Mine is a name split issue.

    My old passport has Last Name = Last Name + First NAme and First NAme = Blank and visa etc it is FNU


    I got my H1B visa inside the US and when I went to the consulate, the lady refused to stamp my visa. I had to go to the passport office and get an "observation" that my name should be read as
    First Name : "FirstName"
    Last Name : "LastName"



    more...


    judith rakers. judith rakers
  • judith rakers



  • vicky007
    10-03 06:49 PM
    We need to start recruitment process. For this it requires job advertisements for 5 weeks in a row, complete the recruitment process.

    Isn't it done before LC filing?

    Guru's please answer this query:

    I have been reading that the BEC would give recruitment instructions for pending cases.I have filed at the Philadelphia BEC in Dec 2004 ,the lawyer had advertised before filing, so will re-advertising still be required?? Please clearify its very confusing.





    hot Judith Rakers will guide judith rakers. judith rakers bikini. rakers dejected jpg middot; 20090711 Administratie
  • judith rakers bikini. rakers dejected jpg middot; 20090711 Administratie



  • Blog Feeds
    12-18 09:50 AM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:


    Last month I blogged about my convoluted math--trying to figure out the wait times for various countries, in various categories for Employment Based visas. The January Visa Bulletin was (http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4597.html) just issued, with this explanation:

    D. EXPLANATION OF THE NUMERICAL CONTROL SYSTEM AND CUT-DATE PROJECTIONS WHAT CAUSES THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CUT-OFF DATES?

    The Visa Office (VO)subdivides the annual preference and foreign state limitations specified in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) into twelve monthly allotments. The totals of documentarily qualified applicants that have been reported to VO are compared each month with the numbers available for the next regular allotment and numbers are allocated to reported applicants in order of their priority dates, the oldest dates first.

    - If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy all reported documentarily qualified demand, the category is considered "Current." For example, if the Employment Third preference monthly target is 3,000 and there are only 1,000 applicants, the category is considered "Current."

    - Whenever the total of documentarily qualified applicants in a category exceeds the supply of numbers available for allotment for the particular month, the category is considered to be "oversubscribed" and a visa availability cut-off date is established. The cut-off date is the priority date of the first documentarily qualified applicant who could not be accommodated for a visa number. For example, if the Employment Third preference monthly target is 3,000 and there are 8,000 applicants, a cut-off date would be established so that only 3,000 numbers would be used, and the cut-off date would be the priority date of the 3,001st applicant.

    Applicants entitled to immigrant status become qualified at their own initiative and convenience and upon the completion of various processing requirements. Therefore, it is extremely important to remember that by no means has every applicant with a priority date earlier than a prevailing cut-off date been processed for final visa action. On the contrary, visa allotments are made only on the basis of the total applicants reported qualified each month, and consideration of other variables. Demand for visa numbers can fluctuate from one month to another, with an inevitable impact on cut-off dates.

    HOW IS THE PER-COUNTRY LIMIT CALCULATED?

    Section 201 of the INA sets an annual minimum Family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000, while the worldwide annual level for Employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 202 sets the per-country limit for preference immigrants at 7% of the total annual Family-sponsored and Employment-based preference limits, i.e. a minimum of 25,620.

    - The annual per-country limitation of 7% is a cap, meaning visa issuances to any single country may not exceed this figure. This limitation is not a quota to which any particular country is entitled, however. The per-country limitation serves to avoid monopolization of virtually all the visa numbers by applicants from only a few countries.

    - INA Section 202(a)(5), added by the American Competitiveness Act in the 21st Century (AC21), removed the per-country limit in any calendar quarter in which overall applicant demand for Employment-based visa numbers is less than the total of such numbers available. In recent years, the application of Section 202(a)(5)has occasionally allowed countries such as China-mainland born and India to utilize large amounts of Employment First and Second preference numbers which would have otherwise gone unused.

    WHAT ARE THE PROJECTIONS FOR CUT-OFF DATE MOVEMENT IN THE FAMILY PREFERENCES?

    Cut-off date movement in most categories continues to be greater than might ordinarily be expected, and this is anticipated to continue for at least the next few months. This is because fewer applicants are proceeding with final action on their cases at consular posts abroad, and the volume of CIS adjustment cases remains low. Once large numbers of applicants begin to have their cases brought to final action, cut-off date movements will necessarily slow or stop.

    Moreover, in some categories cut-off date retrogression is a possibility. Therefore, readers should be aware that the recent rate of cut-off date advances will not continue indefinitely, but it is not possible to say at present how soon they will end.

    WHY DID MOST EMPLOYMENT CUT-OFFS REMAIN UNCHANGED IN RECENT MONTHS?

    Many of the categories were "unavailable" at the end of FY which resulted in excessive demand being received during October and November. Coupled with the fact that CIS Offices have been doing an excellent job of processing cases, this has had an impact on cut-off date movements. Some forward movement has begun for January as we enter the second quarter of the fiscal year.

    WILL THERE BE ANY ADDITIONAL CUT-OFF DATES FOR FOREIGN STATES IN THE EMPLOYMENT FIRST OR SECOND PREFERENCE CATEGORIES?

    At this time it is unlikely that there will be any cut-off dates in the Employment First preferences. It also appears unlikely that it will be necessary to establish a cut-off date other than those already in effect for the Second preference category. Cut-off dates apply to the China and India Second preference categories due to heavy demand, and each has the potential to become "unavailable" should demand cause the annual limit for that category to be reached.

    INA Section 202(a)(5) provides that if total demand will be insufficient to use all available numbers in a particular employment preference category in a calendar quarter, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limits. For example, if it is determined that based on the level of demand being received at that time there would be otherwise unused numbers in the Employment Second preference category, then numbers could be provided to oversubscribed countries without regard to per-country limitations. Should that occur, the same cut-off date would be applied to each country, since numbers must be provided strictly in priority date order regardless of chargeability. In this instance, greater number use by one country would indicate a higher rate of demand by applicants from that country with earlier priority dates.

    Should Section 202(a)(5) be applied, the rate of number use in the Employment preference category would continue to be monitored to determine whether subsequent adjustments are needed in visa availability for oversubscribed countries. This action provides the best possible assurance that all available Employment preference numbers will be used, while still ensuring that numbers remain available for applicants from all other countries that have not yet reached their per-country limit.

    WHAT ARE THE PROJECTIONS FOR CUT-OFF DATE MOVEMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCES FOR THE REMAINDER OF FY-2010?

    Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off dates which will be reached by the end of FY-2010 are as follows:

    Employment Second:

    China: July through October 2005
    India: February through early March 2005
    If Section 202(a)(5)were to
    apply: China and India: October through December 2005

    Employment Third:

    Worldwide: April through August 2005
    China: June through September 2003
    India: January through February 2002
    Mexico: January through June 2004
    Philippines: April through August 2005

    Please be advised that the above date ranges are only estimates which
    are subject to fluctuations in demand during the coming months. The actual
    future cut-off dates cannot be guaranteed, and it is possible that some annual
    limits could be reached prior to the end of the fiscal year.


    So, there you have it. The "official" guesses for FY 2010! It would be terrific, however, if the Visa Bulletin would tell us, based upon its knowledge of pending cases, and estimates on time, how long a case would take in the given categories, if started today. When the Department of State releases THAT information, then perhaps Congress will sit up and take notice that we are facing a literal crisis in our employment based immigration program, and hurting ourselves as a result.https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-2329407886555470879?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/from-department-of-state-with-love-visa.html)



    more...


    house judith rakers #136839 - uludağ judith rakers. Judith Rakers ist
  • Judith Rakers ist



  • amitjoey
    06-18 11:43 AM
    can you guys suggest how to proceed with my cases... where i am totally screwed up.
    When I started to work in usa I was working for an employer in NJ after an year I got a better job offer and started to work for another employer(for whom I have been working for last 2 years).
    Last Month I applied for my I140 with current employer work experience letter and co-worker letter (of my ex-employer in NJ). Now that I have an RFE for my I140 requesting me to send employer experience letter of my ex-employer. When I called up my ex-employer he was rude to me and firmly denied to provide any letter and hanged up the phone. Due to this RFE I am not able to proceed with my I485. Please let me know how to proceed...Thanking you all in advance.

    Yes, Please work on getting the letter and replying to the RFE, But that should not stop you from filing I-485. Pending I-140 is okay for I-485.





    tattoo Judith Rakers judith rakers. Judith Rakers
  • Judith Rakers



  • hanu0913
    10-08 03:12 PM
    Your sentences are confusing. Please no offense.

    You can file your wife's I-485(derivative adjustment) once the PD is current. So just relax and keep on looking Visa Bulletin every month to check if the priority dates are current.

    My case : got GC on June. Filed wife's case in June and she has an EAD.

    All the best.

    so here is exact question , what about if i get GC approval before my PD gets current?



    more...


    pictures Judith Rakers moderiert judith rakers. judith rakers bikini. Klik hier lt;lt;lt; van rakers Bekijk alle
  • judith rakers bikini. Klik hier lt;lt;lt; van rakers Bekijk alle



  • rajuram
    01-14 03:47 PM
    It is just frustrating to visit these forums and see nothing is happening. We need more members and more money. But if that happens in 10 years, what is the use. Not much anyone can do. Might as well as start packing.





    dresses judith rakers bikini. rakers dejected jpg middot; 20090711 Administratie judith rakers. judith rakers bikini. Klik hier lt;lt;lt; van rakers Bekijk alle
  • judith rakers bikini. Klik hier lt;lt;lt; van rakers Bekijk alle



  • VDaminator
    06-06 06:05 PM
    Nice work vd...lol I only see one path...
    There is another path it is just hard to see since it is overlapped by the word evil



    more...


    makeup Judith Rakers; Andreas Pfaff judith rakers. judith rakers #136839 - uludağ
  • judith rakers #136839 - uludağ



  • Ψ
    06-12 01:31 PM
    well here is my last volley not at all great and am not completely satisfied.

    wouldve spent a little more time. but its just dat i have exams and gotta study.
    well heres my last serve hope u like ithttp://img62.photobucket.com/albums/v188/_azzy_/last.jpg





    girlfriend Judith Rakers judith rakers. judith rakers #136841 - uludağ
  • judith rakers #136841 - uludağ



  • bkam
    05-18 03:41 PM
    Good job, IV core group. Media attention is usually a sign that things are getting hot and resolution is a must.

    As other people mentioned below - love to be a member of the IV team (3,000+ smart, dedicated people, wow!)





    hairstyles judith rakers judith rakers. judith rakers bikini. Rakers JPG; Rakers JPG. dalvin200. Jan 15, 08:16 AM
  • judith rakers bikini. Rakers JPG; Rakers JPG. dalvin200. Jan 15, 08:16 AM



  • sledge_hammer
    04-15 10:58 AM
    Your employer did not put a gun to your head and told you to fake your resume. You wanted a quick way to get into a job and you knew what you were doing.

    Like someone else here has commented, you both deserve to pay the price for what you have done!

    Hi,
    I am on H1B without job and no paystubs.
    My employer has been trying to find a project for me but till now he couldnt get anything.
    Its been 6 months alreay since I am on H1B visa.
    He made me modify my actual experience to include fake projects .
    Now I am thinking of filing a complaint to DOL.
    I have my H1B petition and offer letter from the employer.
    But I am worried that if I file complaint ,my employer will threaten me telling that I faked my experience and submitted fake resumes.
    What should I do? Will DOL take any action against me?
    Any success stories of DOL complaint filing?





    simmy78
    08-10 02:13 PM
    I recently heard that the new immigration bill is finally going to be passed in Oct 2010. The highlights would be mainly to use all the green cards alloted irrespective of any country. And to support this bill they will receive all the 485 applications irrespective of the PD. Can anyone confirm if this is accurate info.

    Thanks.





    ingegarcia
    04-17 09:08 AM
    Hi All,

    I am an aspiring US immigrant, and currently work with a desi-like employer who has not been paying me for last 3 months. I have resigned and started working at a new employer, using portability options. I will also contact DOL and report this to get my money back, however, DOL may not be able to recover it if the employer files for bankruptcy. I donot care much about money now, as its not too much and my new job increment covers it.

    Here are my questions

    1) Is there a way i can report this misdoing to USCIS directly. Is there any phone number/contact info to report frauds on I-140s and I-485s as he is holding some employees hostage (not allowing them to move out because of this situation where your money is stuck and so is your immigration).

    2) What else should i do to make this injustice visible? I will work with DOl and get my money back.

    3) I am thinking of reporting this directly to the I-140 processing centers. Is this is a good idea?


    PK

    My guess would be to report it with Labor Department instead...



    No comments:

    Post a Comment